Scorned Woman Posts Teeny Weenie Pics
She who laughs last laughs best. Especially when she’s laughing at her ex-boyfriend’s small dick and the whole world is laughing with her. One very funny 18-year-old female was charged with harassment for posting pics of her ex’s “little” penis on lampposts in his neighborhood. After the 24-year old man ended their brief relationship to date another woman, the Swedish teen posted pictures of her ex’s genitalia, complete with the “tiny” description, and added her ex-lover’s name and phone number to the post, just so no one would confuse his identity. Seriously though, if it was really that small, then why is she pissed he’s with someone else? Good riddance if you ask me (coming from a size queen deluxe). To read the full article, click here.
A 28-year old man/nerdlover has been charged for using World of Warcraft to lure boys into emailing him nude pictures and videos of themselves. (Seriously, who wants naked pictures of pimply pubescent dorks?) The man had apparently accumulated a lot of ‘gold’ in the game World of Warcraft and was exchanging his gold for naked photos and video footage, including “live webcam videos of masturbation.”
Authorities discovered approximately 10,000 illegal pictures and 1200 videos of naked young boys ages 12 – 16 years old in the man’s possession. The man admitted to receiving the photos and videos (obvi), but insists that he didn’t pressure the boys into sending him anything (just ePaid them). Click here for more.
This is one in a series of many stories coming out about people getting canned for something they posted on a social networking site. A cop from Altoona, PA was forced to resign for allegedly posting risqué pix of herself on MySpace. The officer, 27 year-old Abigail Keller, was in her fifth month of full-time service after spending three years as a volunteer reserve officer when a local business person gave city officials in Altoona print-outs of the questionable pictures from her MySpace page.
The police chief hearing the case commented that the pictures depicted Officer Keller in a bar ‘displaying her naked buttocks or mooning the person who is taking the picture‘. And that in another photograph she is ‘performing simulated sex acts on both males and females‘. (Sounds like my kind of girl!) The officer insisted that those photos had been taken down prior to being hired by the police department. She went on to claim that she had forgotten that said photos were even posted and that she was of the belief that access to the site was restricted. (Which it is, if you change your settings, Einstein.)
The police chief ultimately ruled that although Keller might have been justifiably fired, she did not intentionally represent the police department in a negative light (no, they can do that all on their own) and was entitled to unemployment benefits. The police chief’s final comment on the case was that Officer Keller “used poor judgment when she posted these pictures in albums on her social-network pages and naively believed no one but close personal friends could access these pictures“. Well, duh.
WARNING: Anything that you put up on the Internet can and will be viewed by employers, co-workers, potential employers, ex-boyfriends, and former managers who aren’t qualified for their jobs but will get pissy anyway. Are we clear on that?
$@bs
